Common Reasons for UK Standard Visitor Visa Refusal
Whilst many UK standard visitor visa applicants are successful in their request for a visa, sometimes, and for various reasons, an application is denied by the home office. This means entry to the UK is refused. The most common reasons for refusal include:
- The applicant has a criminal record or is deemed to pose a threat to national security.
- The applicant owes a debt to the NHS.
- The applicant does not meet the specific eligibility criteria (for example, they cannot prove they have the financial means to support themselves).
If an application for a UK visitor visa is refused there are different legal processes available in order to challenge the decision and gain entry to the UK in accordance with UK immigration laws. One option is to consider applying for a judicial review.
- Common Reasons for UK Standard Visitor Visa Refusal
- What is a Judicial Review?
- Visit Visa Refusals: Appeal or Judicial Review?
- Who is Eligible to Make a Claim for a Judicial Review?
- Understanding the Grounds on Which a Judicial Review Claim Can Be Made
- Can I Apply for a Judicial Review If I Have a Criminal Record?
- The Process of Applying for Judicial Review
- Preparing for the Final Hearing
- After The Final Hearing
- What If My Request Is Urgent?
- Judicial Review: Legal Costs
- What Is the Success Rate for Judicial Review Cases?
- How Can IAS Help?
What is a Judicial Review?
A judicial review is a legal process in which the decisions of public bodies such as local authorities and those acting on behalf of the government (including the home office) can be challenged.
In terms of immigration, the process differs from a traditional appeal in the fact that it is the decision-making process that is challenged rather than the actual decision. If the decision-making process can be deemed to be unlawful it is possible (in some cases) to overturn refusal decisions and gain entry to or extend a stay in the UK.
The application is put forward to a judge who will determine whether or not the law has been applied correctly to the case and that all legal procedures have been followed in accordance with UK law and immigration rules.
If the judge considers the decision-making process that determined the outcome of a visa application to be unlawful, they can grant permission to reconsider the application in its entirety.
Before starting any legal process to get a refusal decision overturned, it is important to consider all options. There are different routes to take to challenge a refusal decision depending on the grounds for refusal on the original visa application and the applicant’s personal circumstances.
For example, if the refusal decision was made due to insufficient evidence or documentation, this can be corrected by a reconsideration request or by re-applying. However, if it is believed that the provided evidence has not been considered by the Home Office correctly, a legal challenge such as an appeal or a judicial review may be the best option.
Re-applying for a Visa after Refusal
Some applicants may be able to simply re-apply for a visa after refusal. For example, if they need to provide new or updated evidence within their application. When re-applying, applicants must submit an entirely new visa application and, except under exceptional circumstances, will need to pay the fee again.
Since July 2013, it is only possible to appeal a UK visit visa refusal decision based on human rights grounds. Initially, the case is put forward to a first-tier tribunal that will decide whether or not the applicant has the right to appeal. Possible scenarios in which the right of appeal may be granted include the separation of a parent and child or spouse/life partner.
If the applicant’s circumstances do not meet the requirements of an appeal or they have no human rights claim then, in some cases, a judicial review hearing can act as an adequate alternative remedy. If the applicant can prove that the decision-making process behind the refusal decision was unlawful, the decision may be overturned. However, the legal process of a judicial review can often be complex and applicants must meet specific criteria in order to be successful.
Who is Eligible to Make a Claim for a Judicial Review?
To be eligible to make a claim for a judicial review, claimants must meet certain criteria. For example, the claimant must have a ‘significant interest’ in the case. This means that the case directly affects the claimant in some way, whether this be as an individual or as part of a group.
In addition, there are certain grounds on which a claim can be made. These include:
- Procedural unfairness
All applications must be made within three months of the initial refusal decision date and after the grounds for the claim arose.
Understanding the Grounds on Which a Judicial Review Claim Can Be Made
When challenging a visa refusal decision in the UK, there must be grounds to do so. This means that it is believed that all or part of the process used to reach the refusal decision was unlawful or unfair in some way.
In order to determine whether or not the decision-making process could be deemed unlawful, it could be useful to consider the following matters:
- Has the ECO correctly applied the relevant law as set out in the UK’s immigration rules?
- Is the decision in line with the home office’s policy on visitors?
- Has the ECO taken all evidence into account?
- Has the ECO made a factual error?
- Has the ECO provided the applicant with detailed reasons for their decision of refusal?
- Could the decision be deemed to be unreasonable?
If the applicant can provide sufficient evidence that they have grounds to challenge a refusal decision then they have the right to proceed with a judicial review claim.
Can I Apply for a Judicial Review If I Have a Criminal Record?
Having a criminal record can bring extra complications to an already complex procedure such as a judicial review. For example, immigration law in the UK states that it is mandatory to refuse entry to some people that have a criminal record or are judged to pose a risk to national security.
Visa applications will be refused without question if:
- An applicant has been imprisoned for four years or more.
- An applicant is subject to a deportation order.
- An applicant has been sentenced to a period of imprisonment between twelve months and four years (unless a period of ten years has passed since the sentence).
- An applicant has been sentenced to a period of less than twelve months (unless a period of five years has passed since the sentence).
Where these rules apply, unless refusal can be proven to inhibit the applicants’ human rights, it will only be in exceptional circumstances that a claim would be successful. For this to happen factors in the case must be extremely compelling to outweigh public interest.
Usually, a judicial review would not be the right course of action for those refused on criminal grounds, however, each case is treated individually and therefore it is dependent upon the applicant’s criminal history, current status and personal circumstances.
Applicants must first download and submit the UTIAC1 form to their closest regional office. Applicants must include the application fee and any supporting forms or documents within 3 months of their visit visa refusal decision date. If applying late, reasons must be specified in the form and a judge will determine whether or not the application is valid.
The form must specify in detail the ways in which the Entry Clearance Officer (ECO) is unlawful in their decision and state on what grounds they wish to challenge the decision of the specified public body.
If the applicant wishes to challenge a decision to remove them from the UK, then they must follow the protocol written in the ‘immigration judicial review practice direction’ document.
Once received, the tribunal will acknowledge the application by sending the applicant confirmation and ‘sealed’ copies. (Sealed copies of the application are those that have been date-stamped and enclosed in an envelope with an official seal).
The applicant then has nine calendar days from the date of the confirmation to send or hand in the sealed copies of the application to all respondents in the case. Respondents are the public bodies that the applicant wishes to appeal against, for example, the home office.
In addition, a further ‘statement of service’ form (available on the UK government’s website) must be sent to the tribunal within nine calendar days to confirm the above action. The statement of service form is mandatory and therefore if this step is not completed, the entire claim for a judicial review will be classed as invalid and struck off.
The respondents have 21 days from the date of submission of the sealed copies of the application to acknowledge with the tribunal that they have received the documents.
Then, a judge will look into the case and determine whether or not the case should proceed to a judicial review hearing. Further action is dependent on the outcome of the judge’s decision. For example, if permission for a hearing is granted, applicants must:
- Pay the fee using a UTIAC12 form – This must be completed within nine calendar days of the judge’s decision or the case will be considered invalid (struck off).
- Await a final hearing date.
If permission for a hearing is refused the judge will determine whether the application is:
- Totally without merit.
- Not totally without merit.
If the application is determined to be totally without merit, the applicant will not be able to proceed any further unless an appeal is lodged and granted. (To launch an appeal applicants must complete and submit the UTIAC14 form).
If the application is determined to be not totally without merit then the applicant can request a reconsideration on the same grounds as the initial application by completing and submitting the UTIAC11 form.
Should the applicant’s request be granted and permission for a final hearing given, a judge will decide whether or not the decision-making process that determined the initial refusal decision was lawful.
If deemed incorrect, the judge will also be responsible for the outcome of the case. For example, they will specify what action needs to be taken by the respondent body.
If the applicant is unsuccessful in their judicial review claim they may be able to ask for permission to appeal but this is at their own expense.
Preparing for the Final Hearing
If permission is given for a final hearing to go ahead, it is wise to prepare for it so that all evidence can be submitted in a timely and organised fashion. There are certain things applicants may need to ask the tribunal to consider before the hearing takes place. For example:
- Applying for a summons for a witness to attend the hearing – Often applicants wish for someone to attend the hearing as a witness. This could be a family member, friend, support worker or other professionals that can support their application. Occasionally, applicants may wish for a witness to attend the hearing that does not agree to do so, (for example, a doctor). In this situation, the applicant can apply for a ‘summons’ or an order from the tribunal for them to attend.
- Applying to adjourn a hearing – So long as all parties in the case agree, applicants can apply for their hearing to be adjourned for free so long as it is at least 14 days away. To do so, applicants must complete and submit the UTIAC9 form available on the UK government’s website.
- Inform the UTIAC of a change in circumstances – It is the applicant’s responsibility to inform the tribunal of any updates or changes to their legal representation.
- Request copies of the tribunal documents – Applicants have the right to request copies of all documents lodged in their application file for a small fee.
After The Final Hearing
Any action taken after the final hearing will be based on the outcome of the judicial review claim. For example, if the judge determines that the decision-making process used in the initial application is unlawful, they will prepare orders to the recipient body (such as the home office) on the actions they must take to make it so. This could mean that a refusal decision is overturned and the applicant is then allowed entry to the UK.
If the judge determines that the decision-making process on the initial application was lawful in its conduct, the claimant will be unsuccessful in regard to their claim. It is possible to appeal an unsuccessful outcome however the cost must be met by the applicant.
What If My Request Is Urgent?
Where exceptional circumstances apply, applicants can put through their judicial review claim to be considered urgent. These applications are usually reviewed the day they are received by the tribunal. Exceptional circumstances include:
- Being removed from the UK in the immediate future.
- The need to be in the UK asap.
To register an application as urgent applicants must download the application for urgent consideration or interim relief with the UTIAC1 form (UTIAC4) from the UK government’s website.
Judicial Review: Legal Costs
There are several stages to applying for judicial review and various legal costs involved. Firstly, applicants must submit their initial application with a fee that currently stands at £154.
If the initial application for a judicial review is successful and permission is granted for a final hearing, a further cost of £770 must be paid to ensure court proceedings go ahead.
Some applicants may be able to apply for financial aid to help them pay the fees if they meet certain criteria. (For example, if they are on a low income or claim certain benefits).
What Is the Success Rate for Judicial Review Cases?
Applicants wishing to challenge a decision made by the home office via judicial review may often wonder what the likelihood of being successful in their claim may be. However, it is important to remember that all cases are judged individually and upon their own merit and therefore it is not possible to speculate outcomes. A judge will review all evidence and check that the law has been applied appropriately to the case in order to reach their decision.
How Can IAS Help?
Each year thousands of people apply for a UK standard visitor visa for business, study or leisure. Whilst many of these applications are successful, there are many others that fall short of the entry requirements and eligibility criteria which leads to stress, anxiety and difficulty for the applicants.
If you have been refused a UK standard visitor visa, we can help assess your eligibility for a judicial review claim and, if deemed the appropriate course of action, guide you through the entire process from start to finish.
We will help you prepare and implement actions for each stage of the legal process by providing you with detailed information and timely support. We can answer any questions in regards to your case accurately and work through home office guidance with you to maximise your chances of getting your claim approved.
A judicial review can be a complex process and in order to get a refusal decision overturned, you must be able to prove to a judge in a court of UK law that the grounds for your claim are valid and just.
Though it may seem daunting and stressful, you are not alone. Let IAS help you submit your claim and work with you to prepare you for your final hearing so that you may attend feeling well-prepared and confident.
For more information about the services we offer, and how we can help you submit a judicial review claim in order to overturn a visit visa refusal decision, contact us today at 0333 305 9375 or reach out to us online.
Last modified on May 24th, 2023 at 3:26 pm
Need help with an immigration issue? Book a one-to-one advice session with one of our legal caseworkers.
We can complete your visa application on your behalf, taking the stress and hassle out of the process.
Fast Track Package
Need to submit an application quickly? We can help you complete and send it off in as little as 24 hours.
Ensure you have the greatest chance of a successful appeal with our legal support and guidance.
The Advice Package
With our Advice Package, you can book a one-to-one session with one of our legal team and receive bespoke advice tailored for your situation. We will review your case and give you expert advice on how best to proceed with your immigration matter. Reach out to a member of our team and book your session today.
The Application Package
Our Application Package is designed to help relieve the stress of immigration applications. One of our legal caseworkers will help you throughout the entire process, including establishing your eligibility for your chosen route, completing your application form to the highest standards and organising your documents. We will then submit it and monitor its status on your behalf.
The Fast Track Package
Our premium Fast Track Package is ideal if you need to submit an application quickly, such as if you need to meet a tight deadline. Our lawyers will work closely with you to see that your application is completed to the highest standards and ensure you get your application in on time, helping to take the stress and pressure off you.
The Appeal Package
Visa appeals can be a stressful process, especially if you’re relying on a specific visa to be approved. Our legal team can help you navigate the whole process and maximise your chances of a successful appeal, working alongside you to reach a favourable result. We can also represent you in immigration-related hearings and tribunals.