Home Secretary Announces Major New Asylum and Returns Policy

Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has announced major reform to the UK asylum and immigration system. In its paper “Restoring Order and Control,” the government outlines a comprehensive new policy for asylum seekers and returns. Ministers claim this policy is a reset of the UK’s asylum model.

They aim to shift from open-ended protection and generous support towards temporary status, stricter conditions, and a more aggressive removals system, all while keeping a limited number of “safe and legal” routes. The changes have been said to be partly inspired by the Danish immigration system.

What are the UK’s NEW asylum rules?

The statement centres around three main ideas: reducing arrivals, increasing removals, and altering safe and legal routes. Some of the central policies from the paper include:

• Switching the automatic long-term refugee status to a new “core protection” system that grants refugees 30 months of leave. Leave can only be renewed if a refugee still requires protection. There will be no route to settle until 20 years of continuous residence.
• Establishing a Protection Work and Study route so that recognised refugees who meet specific work or study requirements can leave core protection and gain settlement faster. Over time, they will be able to sponsor family members under stricter rules.
• Removing the legal duty to assist destitute asylum seekers and replacing it with the discretionary power to support. Support can be refused or withdrawn from those who can work, have sufficient funds and assets, or deliberately make themselves destitute, or breach the conditions. 
• Asylum seekers are expected to contribute to their own support if they have some financial means. The government will also have the power to recover money if it is found that they have undeclared resources and have deceived the Home Office.
• Discontinuing the use of hotels as accommodation for asylum seekers, and instead moving them to large sites, like old military bases (mainly)
• Increasing enforcement against illegal work, expanding right-to-work checks to include the gig economy and subcontracted jobs, and requiring a digital identity check to prove permission to work. This is expected to be effective by the end of the current parliamentary term.
• Increasing removals, including commencing returns to countries where conditions are believed to have improved (including Syria), prioritising families, and creating ” return hubs” in safe third countries.
• Applying visa penalties, such as suspending visa services for countries that fail to take back their own citizens.
• Establishing a new, separate appeals body, moving towards a “single appeal” model with stricter deadlines, and speeding up cases that are clearly low-merit or high-harm.
• Ensuring it is harder to use Article 8 (family and private life) and altering the modern slavery system to ensure that it is primarily used to delay removal while maintaining core protections.
• An annual cap set by the Home Secretary on safe and legal routes, a stronger focus on community sponsorship, and new capped routes for skilled refugees and refugee students.

Who do the New Asylum Policies Affect?

Recognised Refugees

Individuals who are protected in the future will typically go through the new “core protection” system instead of the current five-year path to settlement. Every 30 months, their right to stay will be evaluated, and it can be revoked if their home country is deemed unsafe. People who move into the Protection Work and Study route or other qualifying categories may be granted options to settle in the UK and sponsor family members earlier; however, the rules will still be stricter than they are now.

Asylum Seekers Waiting for a Decision

Those who are seeking asylum right now receive support based on destitution, and they have a legal right to that support. The new approach removes the duty of care and grants the Home Office the discretion to act. Support can only be given to people who genuinely can’t support themselves and comply with the rules. Support can also be withdrawn if someone breaks the rules, commits a crime, or causes disturbances in the housing.

Children and Families

There are two ways in which family policy is getting stricter. First, core protection will not automatically give people the right to reunite with their families. Family sponsorship will primarily be for individuals who plan to move to a country for longer-term work or study purposes and meet the same conditions as other migrants. Second, families whose asylum claims have been denied will be under greater pressure to leave. 

Individuals who voluntarily return home may be eligible for financial assistance. There will be discussions about forcibly removing families and stopping ongoing support for families that don’t cooperate and don’t have an adequate justification to stay.

Working without Permission and their Employers

Further reforms are primarily targeted at people who don’t have the right to work, like many asylum seekers and people who have been denied work. Illegal working enforcement has already been stepped up, and it will be even stronger when right-to-work checks are expanded to include industries that depend heavily on self-employed or platform workers (like the gig economy).

Asylum Seekers Who Fail their Asylum Claim or are Foreign Criminals

The statement makes it clear that the government plans to increase both voluntary and forced removals. People who fail to win their claims can expect a stricter approach regarding their transfer back to safe countries, including some where returns had been put on hold. There will be a faster process for appeals and repeat claims.

Foreign Criminals – Removals

Foreign national offenders and other “high-harm” people will be given special priority for removal. The connection between claims of modern slavery and removal will be stronger, with more focus on early disclosure and credibility.

Sponsors and Communities

Local governments, community groups, colleges, and businesses are expected to play a greater role in providing safe and legal routes. There will be a cap on the number of people who can be resettled each year, and many programs will use community sponsorship as their main model. New capped routes for skilled refugees and refugee students aim to protect them through work and education, rather than allowing them to arrive and claim asylum independently.

When will the Asylum Changes Come into Effect?

The paper encompasses both short-term adjustments to policies and longer-term revisions to laws. Some aspects, like changes to the way the reconsideration process works in modern slavery cases and evaluations of new age-assessment technology, are already in development. 

Others, including the core protection model, the 20-year settlement threshold, the removal of the statutory support duty, the creation of a new appeals body, and changes to human rights law, will require both primary and secondary legislation. There will be consultations on several topics, including how migrants can access benefits, family removals, and aspects of the sponsorship system, scheduled to continue into 2026. The government’s own deadlines for ending hotel use and starting digital right-to-work checks are linked to the end of the current Parliamentary Session, not a specific date on the calendar.

How do the Asylum Plans Fit in with the ECHR?

The statement does not explicitly state that the UK will withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Still, it does make it clear that ministers intend to “reset” the application of Articles 8 and 3 in cases involving immigration and asylum. The government seeks to enact laws in three areas: 

Article 3 is absolute, and the objective is to work with other nations to make it more straightforward what counts as “inhuman or degrading treatment” when deciding whether to remove or deport someone. The policies are formally presented as working within the ECHR framework, but they also aim to limit and clarify their impact on asylum seekers and removals.

Why are the Government Making Changes to the Asylum System?

The Prime Minister and Home Secretary claim that the policy is a response to the rising number of asylum seekers, the growing number of enforcement backlogs, and public worry about cost and control. 

They say that the UK’s current policy of generous long-term protection, open eligibility for support, and slow removals has made the country more appealing than its European neighbours. They say that this “pull factor” needs to be addressed to maintain support for any asylum system. Supporters will see the plan as restoring order and bringing the UK more in alignment with the stricter European mainstream. 

Opponents will likely focus on how the new model impacts refugee rights, the duration and uncertainty of temporary protection, and whether it meets international obligations. The answers to those questions will depend on how the law is written, how it is implemented, and how international courts and other countries respond when cases begin to test the new system.

Asylum Case Studies

Asylum Claim from Namibia

Our client was seeking asylum in the UK because of ongoing sexual violence and threats from a family member in her home country of Namibia.

Read Article

UK Asylum Appeal Success for Honduran National

IAS were approached by a Honduran woman in her late 60s who required assistance with an asylum appeal. Her initial asylum application was submitted without legal representation, which resulted in errors when presenting her case. 

Read Article

Asylum Claim Appeal from Ethiopia

IAS were approached by a client from Ethiopia to help overturn an unsuccessful asylum claim. 

Read Article

UK Family Asylum Appeal for Iraqi Family

Our lawyers were approached by an Iraqi national and his family to assist with a complex asylum appeal case. 

Read Article